Your personal data be that is information you willingly put up on Social Media for select or mass consumption versus data searches or online shopping is all kept up in the data clouds for infinity and beyond.
How many have "Googled" themselves or others to find dirt? Trolled Facebook, Instagram or Twitter to dig the dirt and glean information that goes beyond inquiring via a job application or invitation to a social occasion? Everyone does and what you often find are falsehoods, bizarre out of date information, private information and sheer embarrassing past histories that have nothing to do with the present. Deleting one's account and some information is possible but not entirely comprehensive nor permanent.
If you are following the story of the crazy Attorney whose rant at a restaurant that went viral you should. It has become a cause dujour on outing a clearly idiotic man who should have realized you can run but hide not in today's social media culture.
So when I read this story I laughed out loud. It was a rant that was idiotic and seemed to have no point other that to demonstrate his racism. I cannot excuse or justify my rant yesterday but someone has to stand up for what is right but this story proves that you are watched all the time and you need to be aware of this that at even at your ugliest you are watched.
I was well aware of that as I am all the time now when walking into classrooms as Students use them endlessly. Yesterday I screamed at the top of my lungs at a student who called me a liar. All over the fact that I did not take the kids to the gym. I informed them at the time I was not covered by insurance liability and could not ensure that all gym items as well as safety issues as a result so I chose to make it a study day. (I did not tell them I thought anyone would be nuts to take abusive kids and from what I witnessed all day I was right, to a secluded gym with weapons aka balls etc. in which I could be hurt) but he simply did not listen then or at that time. He kept insisting I lied to them. He said the Teacher informed me that I was supposed to and that I told the kids she did not. So really when I left explicit notes, spoke to Admins and other Teachers about this issue I am now being called a liar by her as well? Really? It was after that trying to be reasonable I screamed so loud I am fairly certain I could be heard down the hall. But that is where I was standing in the doorway in the hall by an exit door all intentional, both out of range of any cellphones that could record my blowout and in turn I could walk out of the building if needed. This is how I walk into a school and I was more upset that I blew my stack to that point I could not believe it. I wanted this kid to feel like shit as this is what I feel everyday walking into the schools. I was angry at myself getting this angry but it becomes overwhelming to constantly be disrespected and treated like shit on a daily basis that eventually you crack. I am cracked beyond repair at this point.
And that is a double edged sword at times it exposes the truth and yet at other times it just exposes ugliness from which at one point you need to move past. The woman giving the finger to Trump, the woman screaming a cops on the side of the road, the woman screaming at the Flight Attendants and now this Attorney who simply needs to move on and maybe out of New York if he has a problem with people speaking Spanish. May I suggest Wyoming? But now he will lose his livelihood and in turn be the pariah that in one way needs to be shared but in another he can never move past from. Do you really want your past to follow you like Linus' blanket forever?
This site will remove your mug shot — for a price, authorities say. Its owners are charged with extortion.
by Samantha Schmidt
The Washington Post
May 18 2018
Ever since the fall of 2013, Jesse T., of Sonoma County, Calif., has found it nearly impossible to land a job. He’s applied for construction, manufacturing and electrical positions, with no luck. After nearly a year of unreturned calls and emails, his friend alerted him to a troubling Web page.
His friend asked if Jesse was in prison, according to an arrest warrant, which did not give Jesse’s last name. When Jesse searched his own name in Google, the first result was a post on Mugshots.com, a website that mines publicly available arrest records from across the country. It indicated that Jesse had been arrested, and included his full name, address and the reason for his detention.
Jesse was, in fact, arrested in September 2013, but he was never charged with a crime. He was simply detained for 12 days and then released. But Mugshots.com made no such distinction. Jesse became convinced that the post, which included his full name, address and the reason for his detention, had ruined his reputation, making it difficult to find a job or even start a romantic relationship.
He clicked on a link to a related site, Unpublisharrest.com, which offered to remove the information — but demanded that Jesse pay $399. He called a number associated with the Web page, and told a man on the other line that his demands were illegal, according to an arrest warrant. The man laughed and hung up.
Jesse is one of thousands of people across the country who California prosecutors say have been extorted by Mugshots.com. Between 2014 and 2017, Mugshots.com allegedly took more than $2.4 million in fees from at least 5,703 people nationwide who wanted their photos removed from the site, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a news release Wednesday. About 175 of those individuals had billing addresses in California.
Becerra has filed charges of extortion, money laundering and identity theft against four men who are allegedly behind Mugshots.com. The arrest warrant, which seeks to extradite the men to California, names Sahar Sarid, Kishore Vidya Bhavnanie, Thomas Keesee and David Usdan as the alleged owners and operators of Mugshots.com. None of the men could be located for comment. The website appears to still be operating as usual.
Mugshots.com is one of several websites nationwide that make money by publicizing arrest information and demanding fees through intermediary sites to swipe records clean.
Mugshots.com and similar websites say they are simply republishing arrest information that is already publicly available through government records. Mugshots.com shows a disclaimer in capitalized letters at the top of its Web page saying the information on its website is in no way an indication of guilt or evidence that an actual crime has been committed.
But to many people whose photos have cropped up on the site, such disclaimers are not enough to make up for the damage to their reputation. Mugshots.com refuses to take down criminal record information unless that person pays a fee, usually $399, through the secondary website, Unpublisharrest.com. They make no exceptions — even if the person’s charges were dismissed or if the arrest was due to a mistaken identity or law enforcement error, according to a law enforcement affidavit, which included interviews with 18 people.
“This pay-for-removal scheme attempts to profit off of someone else’s humiliation,” Becerra said in a statement. “Those who can’t afford to pay into this scheme to have their information removed pay the price when they look for a job, housing, or try to build relationships with others. This is exploitation, plain and simple.”
Websites like Mugshots.com have been operating for years, particularly in Florida. In 2012, the Miami Herald called mug shot websites the “hot new internet business.” One of the first such websites appears to have been Arrrests.org, operated by Rob Wiggen, a 33-year-old Floridian skilled in computer programming. He would post hundreds of new mug shots on a daily basis, mining law enforcement websites in Florida and four other states, the Herald reported.
An intermediary website would, in turn, charge people hundreds of dollars to remove mug shots.
A number of lawsuits have previously tried to target Mugshots.com. Last year, Illinois resident Peter Gabiola filed a federal lawsuit seeking class-action status against Mugshots.com, alleging it posted incomplete criminal records so that its sister site could solicit “takedown” fees from people, the Chicago Tribune reported.
Gabiola said he was fired an hour after starting a new job because the employer saw his retail theft arrest record online. Even after the Illinois Department of Corrections had removed his records from its website, the information was still available on Mugshots.com, the Tribune reported.
In 2012, an attorney filed a class-action lawsuit against Mugshots.com and other booking photo websites, but was not able to locate the owners to serve them.
The owners of Mugshots.com have tried to conceal their identities by listing their business address in Nevis, West Indies, registering their domain name in Belize and using a website hosting company in Australia, according to the attorney general’s affidavit. They also hide behind dissolved or inactive limited liability companies. In doing so, “the owners avoid service of process by those who have been injured through their business practices, giving their victims no recourse to seek damages,” the affidavit stated.
The repercussions of a post on Mugshots.com can carry on long after a person dies.
Rosa S., a resident of Ventura County, told investigators her late husband, Tony, was jailed for one night in 1998. He was never charged with a crime, and had no criminal history. In 2002, he committed suicide.
Their son has the same name as his father, and when she searched her son’s name on the Internet, the first result that popped up was her late husband’s booking photo.
When she called Mugshots.com to have it removed, she was told she would have to pay.
The mother said what Mugshots is doing “is very ugly,” the affidavit stated. “They are profiting from people’s pain.”